America has committed a holocaust against the Global South

Between America’s direct military actions, clandestine activities, and prolific weapons sales, it has been obvious for a long time that the US is an agent of chaos and merchant of death with the blood of millions on its hands. Its illegal invasion of Vietnam, for example, killed between 1-3 million people. The US backed assassination of Patrice Lumumba set off a civil war in the Congo that killed millions more. American weapons have also been used to slaughter countless people in places as far flung as Indonesia, Bangladesh, and El Salvador.

Given this history, America’s brutality and hegemonic ambitions have been easy to see for anyone not blinded by tribal loyalties or brainwashed by the Western world’s powerful propaganda machine. These examples are enough, by themselves, to condemn the US as an evil empire. However, a new study recently revealed the full extent of its depravity by showing how the destructive impact of its quest for global domination extends far beyond the battlefield. 

According to the Lancet Global Health, American economic and financial sanctions killed roughly 38 million between 1971-2021. These people weremurdered because America’s leaders used their control of the global financial system to prevent entire nations from purchasing food and medicine. 

As the LA Times explained, sanctions are “the preferred weapon of the United States and some allies — not because they are less destructive than military action, but more likely because the toll is less visible. They can devastate food systems and hospitals and silently kill people without the gruesome videos of body parts in tent camps and cafes bombed from the air. They offer policymakers something that can deliver the deadly impact of war, even against civilians, without the political cost.”

Aside from highlighting the sadistic logic that guides American policymakers, this study also shows their deranged actions are not an anomaly. American leaders from both its major political parties, across multiple generations, enacted policies intentionally designed to deprive innocent people of food and medicine. These crimes cannot be blamed on a single madman. Their long duration and bi-partisan support shows they are the result of a systemic rot that transcends politics.

True to form, except for the LA Times, not one of America’s other major magazines, newspapers, or TV stations deemed intentionally denying millions of people the means to buy food and medicine newsworthy. The Washington Post was too busy describing Iran as an “outlaw regime” while foreignpolicy.com was trying, once again, to convince everyone China is a threat to world peace. Instead of causing the sort of introspection and outrage one would expect from a nation that just found out its leaders murdered 38 million people, the American people and their legacy media outlets completely ignored the study, just as they have ignored their government’s long list of war crimes over the years.

Their apathy is due to a variety of factors that largely boil down to racism and greed. The architects of these sanctions were mostly white men1 whereas their victims were mostly non-Europeans, a.k.a., “people of color,” residing in the Global South. This is the shorthand term used to refer to the nations of Latin America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania that were once violently conquered and colonized by Europeans. Unlike most of the indigenous populations of North America and Australia, the people of these regions survived the genocidal onslaught of their European conquerors and eventually freed themselves from direct Western control. 

Despite attaining nominal independence, most have yet to fully recover from the impact of having their resources systemically looted for centuries. They are usually weak, impoverished and trapped by neocolonial shackles designed to allow various members of the Western coalition, and the predominantly white elites who rule them, to maintain control over their resources. As the Western bloc’s primary enforcer, America uses sanctions as a mechanism to reassert control over those who try to break free of these shackles. They are meant to punish wayward subjects who have forgotten their place in the Western world’s “rules based” order by fomenting instability and despair with the goal of installing pliant rulers who follow orders. 

The sociopathic tendencies evidenced by this study have been on full display in Gaza the past two years; however, these findings show America’s willingness to help apartheid Israel starve and bomb Palestinians is just one part of a tale that spans decades and has claimed an unfathomable number of lives. It lays bare the full extent of America’s crimes, and unequivocally shows it is a violent and destructive force for evil throughout much of the world that has yet to fully exorcise the racist demons that have haunted its entire existence. 

When the toll from its sanctions, weapons sales, and violent military actions are combined, the estimated number of people murdered by America since the Vietnam War soars past 52 million2. By comparison, the Nazis are justifiably reviled for initiating a holocaust against Jews, Catholics, Gypsies, homosexuals, and others they deemed “undesirable” that killed 11 million people. America’s holocaust has claimed nearly five times as many lives.

These findings shatter the myth America is a moral state acting to preserve an international system designed to allow all the world’s nations to thrive. Some might argue morals have no relevance to geopolitics. But they fail to realize America’s unique image as a moral state was one of the foundational cornerstones of its claim to power and contributed significantly to its allure and ability to garner international support for its policies. Without this illusion, it becomes clear America’s power is primarily maintained through the inherently self-defeating and unsustainable tools of force and coercion. By relying on such methods, America’s leaders are proving there is nothing exceptional about their empire, which means it is doomed to follow the same path as all those that have come before it. Its rapidly growing debt, obsession with war and hegemony, widening socio-economic inequalities, and dysfunctional political system suggest its end will come sooner rather than later. 

The victims of these genocidal policies must use the reprieve created by America’s looming implosion to implement reforms designed to make sure they never fall prey to such crimes again. Though they followed very different paths to get there, Japan and China have both shown how. Each instituted drastic political and economic reforms to build the industrial and technological foundations needed to protect themselves. They also invested heavily in their public education systems to ensure their people could contribute to their technological advancement. By developing their indigenous capabilities, they ended their dependence on Western capital and technology and learned to build modern militaries, insulating themselves from Western control and punitive measures. 

The elites who rule the Global South will need to enact similar reforms. They will also need to continue strengthening organizations like BRICS, Mercosur, the African Union, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) so they can work together to protect each other the same way Western nations work together to control and exploit them. Until they build trade networks that do not rely on the US dollar, they will remain vulnerable to the genocidal policies used by the West to control them. They can either follow the Japanese model by voluntarily implementing the necessary reforms, or they can follow the Chinese model, and wait for the marginalized masses they rule to sweep them away in the tumult of revolution. Either way, as the sanctions currently in place against Cuba, Iran, and many other places show, these crimes will never end until they take the steps needed to end them. 

  1. The US Senate, for example, is currently comprised of 88 white men and is considered one of the most diverse in its history. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/21/119th-congress-brings-new-growth-in-racial-ethnic-diversity-to-capitol-hill/#:~:text=Congress remains far less racially,80% of the U.S. population.
  2. In addition to the 38 million people that prompted this piece, the invasion of Vietnam killed 1-3 million and set off a civil war in Cambodia that killed another 1.5-3 million. Arms sales and support for death squads in El Salvador killed 75k and another 200k in Guatemala. The civil war in Congo killed 5.4 million people. The War on Terror killed 4.5 million. Support for Saudi Arabia’s war against Yemen killed 377k. The massacres in Bangladesh and Indonesia killed 1-3 million and 500k-1 million, respectively. Added together, this partial list shows the toll of America’s crimes exceeds 52 million.
Tagged : / / / /

How to end the war with Iran

On February 28th, America and Israel once again used the cover of diplomatic negotiations to launch an unprovoked and unjustified attack on Iran. On a superficial level, this latest round of violence appears to be repeating and entrenching patterns set in motion decades ago when the US first established itself as the dominant military power in the Middle East. However, Iran’s forceful response suggests America and Israel may have bitten off more than they can chew. The implications of their overreach could reshape the region’s entire geopolitical landscape.

To understand why requires understanding America’s political objectives and why they are no longer feasible. These have been framed as preventing Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, degrading its missile and drone capabilities, instituting regime change, and even “liberating” the Iranian people. These explanations are best characterized as either tactical goals or propaganda that have little connection to America’s overarching strategic objectives. America’s goals are not simply to degrade Iran’s military capabilities and they clearly have nothing to do with helping Iran’s people. Its goals are to maintain its control over the entire region while simultaneously ensuring apartheid Israel’s dominance by destroying the only state willing to openly defy it.

Viewed in this context, the conflict with Iran is merely the latest battle in a campaign that began in earnest with the first Persian Gulf War, expanded during the so called “War on Terror” and included the destruction of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Yemen, and Sudan. At its core, America’s strategy is primarily based upon ensuring the region is ruled by inherently weak dictatorships or failed states that are incapable of challenging its military primacy or Israeli hegemony. 

TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC OVERVIEW 

Iran responded to the joint American-Israeli assault by launching thousands of missiles and drones at targets in Israel and American military installations located in allied Arab countries throughout the region. It then expanded these attacks to include regional energy infrastructure after its energy facilities were attacked. These strikes destroyed or damaged several important energy production sites as well as radars, communications nodes, and intelligence facilities used to track and shoot down its ballistic missiles and drones while also forcing its adversaries to deplete their stocks of air defense missiles. 

Iran’s attacks have been particularly painful for America’s partners in the Arab world. They have shattered the image of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states as an oasis of calm in an otherwise turbulent region, degraded important energy infrastructure and caused sever economic disruptions that will have long lasting effects. According to a report by Al Jazeera, GCC nations and Iraq face the prospect of significant drops to their GDPs and oil revenue that will only get worse as the conflict drags on. 

They have also exacted a heavy toll on America’s military infrastructure and equipment. Several high-value radar installations costing billions of dollars have been destroyed and satellite images show many of its bases have suffered significant damage. America has also lost three F15 fighter jets, 12 reaper drones, an E3 AWACS aircraft, and one KC-130J refueling tanker while a massive fire on the USS Ford forced it to withdraw from the fight. Iranian missiles also damaged several KC-130Js and an F-35. 13 American troops are confirmed dead and roughly 200 have been injured. Israel’s censors and a compliant Western media have prevented an objective assessment of the damage it has sustained; however, videos circulating on social media indicate its vaunted air defenses have been routinely penetrated by Iranian missiles and that several of its tanks have been destroyed in Lebanon. 

Most importantly, Iran has effectively closed the Straits of Hormuz, a vital passageway for 20% of the world’s energy supplies. These actions sent oil prices soaring from $67 a barrel to over $100 but these figures are nothing compared to the impact on energy prices if the Houthis close the Red Sea to shipping. Though they have yet to fully join the fight, they have quietly built a force of 350,000 troops that would allow them to wreak havoc should they decide to do so.

Military strategists often talk about destroying an enemy’s “center of gravity” as the surest means to victory. America’s penchant for decapitation strikes reflect its attempts to follow this maxim. In this war, the Straits represent America’s and the GCC’s center of gravity. Iran’s closure of this passage therefore represents a crucial blow against America and its allies. Iran, on the other hand, has developed a “mosaic” defensive posture that contains no center. Its military consists of 31 different operational commands, each capable of fighting independently. 

The closest thing Iran has to a center is Kharg island but taking it would most likely involve sailing an amphibious force through the Straits and up the entire length of the Persian Gulf which would expose it to coastal batteries, kamikaze drones, and mines. Even if such a force arrived intact and took the island, the ships needed to keep it supplied would have to make this same journey. An assault involving paratroopers would run into similar logistical issues. In other words, Iran’s center is well protected and unlikely to fall while America’s has already been taken. 

Despite absorbing thousands of strikes and sustaining heavy casualties, Iran continues to defy two of the most powerful militaries on Earth, all while keeping deadly assets like the Houthis in reserve. Its strategy has created the risk of a global recession while exposing the fundamental contradictions that govern the region’s US imposed security architecture by showing it has made the Arab states that invested billions to build it less secure. 

The Trump administration is so desperate, it is openly contemplating using ground troops and proxies to secure the objectives its air campaign failed to achieve. It is also asking other nations to help it lift Iran’s blockade of the Straits and even removed sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil in an attempt to stabilize energy prices. Despite these early successes, it is still too early to tell whether Iran’s government can maintain its resistance in the face of the devastating attacks it has endured. 

The true test will come over the next few weeks and months. Once Israeli, American, and Arab air defense ammunition stockpiles are sufficiently depleted, Iran will be well-positioned to inflict significantly more damage, assuming it still has enough drones and missile launchers. If it is able to do so, even Israel’s censors will have a hard time hiding the results. More importantly, if it can maintain the closure of the Straits for an extended period of time, it will impose significant costs on America and its allies. 

America’s military posture in the Middle East has always been unsustainable and doomed to end ignominiously. Its military presence is designed to protect a violent apartheid state and relies on brutal Arab dictatorships to sustain itself, but these allies are the primary cause of the region’s instability. As a result, protecting them has trapped America in a quagmire of its own making. 

Iran’s attacks are merely exposing the fragility that comes with pursuing unrealistic imperial ambitions thousands of miles from home. Compounding the issue, America is nearly $40 trillion in debt (a significant portion of which was accumulated in pursuit of those aforementioned imperial ambitions) and simply cannot afford to expend more resources on the Middle East, let alone a protracted war. The cascading impact of rising energy prices will only make its position more precarious. Combined, these factors will place the US in an increasingly untenable position, one that could lead to defeat and its military withdrawal from the entire region.

IRAN IS IN A LOSE-LOSE SITUATION

Unfortunately for Iran, the prospect of victory brings its own peril. Instead of allowing Iran to defeat them, the evil people who rule Israel and America could very easily use nuclear weapons against it. Both nations are led by war criminals and sociopaths who already have the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent people on their hands. Donald Trump spent his first term in office helping Saudi Arabia murder nearly 400,000 people in Yemen. His ally, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is wanted for war crimes relating to the genocide he unleashed in Gaza that killed at least 70,000 people including 20,000 children. 

Some might believe that no rational person would use nuclear weapons absent an existential threat since doing so would make Israel far less safe over the long run. Aside from unleashing poisonous radioactive fallout, using such weapons would inevitably lead to their proliferation across the region and would likely culminate in mushroom clouds over Tel Aviv and Haifa one day. 

The problem is that the men in charge of America and Israel are not rational people. They have no morals, empathy, or sense of honor which makes them perfectly capable of doing evil and barbaric things, like dropping nuclear bombs on Iran for having the audacity to defend itself from their hypocritical and completely unjustified violence. Instead of admitting defeat, they are far more likely to commit unspeakable horrors if they calculate doing so will allow them to save face.

Whereas success on the battlefield could trigger a nuclear reprisal, defeat could lead to decades of chaos and anarchy. If America and Israel manage to re-open the Straits and neutralize Iran’s drones, missiles, and air defenses, they will likely spend several months bombing the country’s political, economic, and military infrastructure and institutions while arming separatist groups and factions throughout it. This could plunge Iran into a civil war that last decades, turning it into a failed state like Libya or Yemen. In either case, millions of innocent Iranians will die.

In summary, America and Iran are on the precipice of disaster and they are poised to drag the rest of the region and possibly the world down with them. Both desperately need a way to pull back but neither seems capable of devising a practical way to do so. America’s leaders are still clinging to the fantasy that they can prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons but Iran’s ability to dismantle its military infrastructure and block energy and trade arteries suggests those days are over. Whereas Gaza revealed America’s and Israel’s brutality and racist hypocrisy, the war against Iran has revealed their vulnerability and the unsustainable nature of the region’s current military dynamics.

A WAY FORWARD

It is certainly possible Iran’s tenacious defense forces America and Israel to de-escalate, leading to an era of relative calm in the same way Hezbollah’s thrashing of Israeli forces in 2006 led to nearly two decades of calm in Lebanon. Even if they decide to unilaterally end their illegal war, it will not lead to a long lasting peace without a comprehensive political agreement that addresses the underlying issues driving this conflict.

The only way to do that is to build a new security architecture that allows America to withdraw its forces and end its toxic role in the region. The need to do so has been obvious for years. America’s first attack on Iraq and the sanctions regime that followed killed 1.5 million people. Its post 9/11 assault on the Muslim world killed another 4.5 million. When the toll from these crimes are added to the list of victims from its support for the Saudi war in Yemen and apartheid Israel’s genocidal violence, the total figure approaches 6.5 million people. The war on Iran, a nation of 92 million people, has the potential to add millions more to the list. The need to end America’s reign of terror has never been greater. 

The only countries with the power to end it are Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. Though they are all aligned with America, they are also in grave danger due to its reckless actions and unequivocal support for apartheid Israel. America’s plans to arm Iranian Kurdish and Baloch separatist groups will inevitably cause chaos in Turkey and Pakistan. At the same time, Israeli leaders have begun openly identifying Turkey as a future strategic threat while Israel’s long-standing military cooperation with India raises serious concerns for Pakistan. Saudi Arabia is in even greater danger since much of its land has been earmarked for the Greater Israel project. Each of these nations has a vested interest in creating a new regional order capable of ensuring their long term security needs. 

Thankfully, they already have the beginnings of a framework in place. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia entered into a formal defense treaty shortly after Israel’s attack on Qatar last year. Turkey has been in talks to join their pact and Iran has also expressed interest. Expanding it to include Turkey and Iran and adding an economic dimension in the form of a free trade agreement would create the foundation of a new system that could allow these core regional states to assume security responsibilities for the entire region. Donald Trump has good relationships with the leaders of all three nations and both Pakistan and Turkey have good working relationships with the Iranian government. As such, they are well-positioned to convince America to change course and create a new security paradigm capable of replacing it.

Whether they take the necessary steps will largely depend on Turkish President Erdogan, Pakistan’s Field Marshal Munir and, to a lesser extent, Saudi Arabia’s Muhammad Bin Salman. These three men hold the key to stabilizing the entire region but they can only do so by working together to devise a comprehensive solution that integrates Iran into a new regional order. The alternative is allowing this war to spiral out of control in a way that eventually consumes all their nations.

Tagged : / / / / / / / / / / /